Stand Up for Others Without Burning Bridges

There’s a belief that usually gets celebrated without inspection - If I’m standing up for others, I’m doing the right thing.

And sometimes that’s absolutely true.

But sometimes… it becomes a shield. A stance. A storyline that quietly authorizes behavior we’d never tolerate if it were aimed at us.

I learned this watching a friend of mine over time.

She is persistently standing up for people her organization serves — people who don’t have a seat at the table. When she first described the fight she was engaging in, I felt nothing but admiration.

But as I got a deeper glimpse into her patterns, I started to see something else.

Yes, she says the “right” words. But her delivery has a sting to it — glaring, cutting people off, refusing to acknowledge what others are saying, positioning herself as right and them as wrong.

Over time, her approach derailed her relationship with coworkers. They don’t trust her, and she doesn’t trust them.

Now she has to push harder and louder to be heard, because the relational safety that makes giving feedback that’s received and acted on isn’t there anymore.

Here’s the part that really stands out - in her determination to advocate for others, she began replicating some of the very standards she was railing against — othering, shaming, dehumanizing people “for the greater good.”

And, what’s more, she refused to acknowledge that her delivery  might be part of what’s making change harder. 

The hidden shift: advocacy to martyrdom

Once trust breaks down, something predictable happens in the mind, we start collecting evidence.

My friend has become more entrenched in being the martyr — more justified — because she keeps seeing “proof” that others are against her. The collateral damage becomes confirmation. 

See? They don’t care. They’re the problem. They’re out to get me.

So she doubles down.

And that’s how an altruistic intention can harden into a harmful approach.

“It’s me, hi, I’m the problem, it’s me.”

I’ve also worked with a client who came in with a similar propensity: strong values, a deep sense of responsibility, and a reflex to jump in when something felt inappropriate or harmful.

But he was feeling the strain in his relationships, personally and professionally, and he could tell his communication style was part of the pattern.

The key difference wasn’t that he cared more. It was that he was willing to look inward and sit with the uncomfortable truth of his own impact. 

He started noticing a pattern: fractured relationships (at home and at work) because his well-meaning feedback wasn’t landing. He saw the disconnect between intention and impact — and he wanted to do something about it.

That’s why he sought coaching. 

The skill that changed everything: the pause

What my client started practicing wasn’t “nicer words.”

It was a different internal posture.

He learned to pause, activate curiosity and shift out of his reactive, fight stance. 

He created space in the pause by reflecting on questions like,

• What story am I telling myself right now?

• What if there’s another way to approach this situation?

• What impact do I actually want to have here?

That intentional pause created a pivot. Instead of arriving as the prosecutor, he began arriving as a human.

He practiced genuine curiosity, not the performative kind. 

Through embracing curiosity as a way of showing up, he learned to acknowledge what others are saying (even when he disagrees). He started to make space for context so he can understand other people’s needs and perspectives. He brought empathy into the room without abandoning accountability.

He still named what was inappropriate. He still stood up for aligning organizational values with action. He just stopped doing it from a place that required someone else to be the villain. 

And here’s what surprised him: as his delivery became more regulated and more curious, his feedback became more powerful, not less.

Because receptivity and safety are paramount for learning and growth. And he needed trust in order to have the impact he wanted.

Why this matters right now

We’re living in a time of extreme divisiveness and dehumanization. It’s easy to get so deeply attached to being right that we end up doing harm.

And if we’re truly trying to live and lead in alignment with our values, we have to be honest about this…

When we lead with contempt — even in the name of justice — we create resistance, not repair.

People stop listening. They get defensive. They focus on the attack instead of the issue.

They shutdown, avoid or double -down.

And the “good fight” becomes a catalyst for resistance. 

A challenge for wholehearted leaders

The next time you feel the urgency to fight the good fight, pause and get curious.

1) What belief is driving me?

Pay attention to the thoughts and stories swirling around in your head. 

Try articulating them aloud to someone not directly involved in the situation. Or write them down (journaling is a great tool). 

It’s easy to over-identify with thoughts as the Truth. When in reality, the explanation you have is a part of your perception and does not encompass every piece of the story.

Questioning your certainty creates room for other people to have a voice so they feel seen, heard and safe enough to engage.

2) What impact do I want to have?

Before you speak, reflect on how you’re showing up. 

What are you broadcasting? Is it care, contempt, fear, superiority, urgency?

People respond to your energy before they process your content. This is our mirror neurons at work, mimicking the brain activity of those we are interacting with. If you’re armoured up and ready to fight, others’ will react to your dysregulation to protect themselves. 

3) What does accountability with compassion look like?

Curiosity doesn’t mean you let harm slide. It means you refuse to dehumanize to make your point. 

Creating conditions for accountability and compassion to co-exist requires clarity around two things. 

The first is the point you are striving to make. When people are fired up, it’s easy to start nit picking at every little thing wrong while failing to address the underlying issue at hand. Get clear about the problem you want to address and stick to it.

The second is clarity around the other person’s perspective. Understanding where someone else is coming from, and what motivates them doesn’t excuse harm — it helps you be effective. When people feel understood and cared for they’re more likely to want to change.

The real measure of standing up for others

Standing up for others isn’t just what you say. It’s whether you can do it in a way that:

• builds trust instead of burning it,

• invites accountability instead of triggering defensiveness,

• and keeps you aligned with the humanity you’re trying to protect.

Where might your advocacy be correct in content… but costly in impact?

And what would become possible if you built in one small pause, not to soften your truth, but to strengthen your leadership?

Downloadable Resources

Turn the insights in this week’s newsletter into action by downloading this worksheet for free (this is only available to subscribers of Challenge Accepted - it’s my way of saying thank you)!

The Impact Pause

If you’ve found value in what I wrote here and you want to support me in continuing to create, guide, write, and make space for deeper transformation, I invite you to buy me a tea.

Buy Me a Tea